Are you struggling with topping from the bottom in your D/s dynamic? Learn what topping from the bottom really means, why it happens, and how Dominants and submissives can rebuild trust, improve communication, and create deeper, more satisfying power exchange relationships.
.png)
Here’s the situation: you and your partner have established Dom and sub roles for a scene, some sexy time in the bedroom, or maybe an in-depth power exchange relationship. The task seems simple: the Dom leads, the submissive follows. But once the scene starts—or the Dom begins making decisions within the relationship—the submissive subtly (or not so subtly) begins resisting, trying to control the situation, or undermining directives… or so it seems.
This situation is often called topping from the bottom, and it’s frequently viewed as problematic because it appears antithetical to the purpose of a Dom/sub dynamic. When this happens, both Dom and submissive often end up frustrated. The Dom wants to lead. The submissive wants to surrender. Yet something is preventing the structure from functioning as intended.
What’s often misunderstood is that topping from the bottom is usually symptomatic of something deeper—not simply the result of a “bad” submissive or someone trying to be difficult. It’s not something a submissive typically strives to achieve, yet it happens quite frequently, often to the surprise of everyone involved. Rather than immediately assigning blame, it’s a signal to pause and get curious about why the situation is occurring.
Let’s examine this dynamic more closely—what it is and isn’t, why it might be happening, whether it’s actually a bad thing, and how both Dom and sub can work together to address it.
Topping from the bottom refers to situations in which the submissive attempts to force, demand, or subtly manipulate the Dom into doing what they want instead of allowing the Dom to lead as agreed. It can also show up as telling the Dom how they should be doing things. In essence, the submissive attempts to control the dynamic in ways that were not consensually agreed upon—and may even contradict the established structure of the relationship.
Topping from the bottom might look like:
Experiencing topping from the bottom is similar to backseat driving. If the passenger (the sub) keeps trying to steer the driver (the Dom) instead of trusting them to navigate, the entire experience becomes tense, less enjoyable, and ultimately counterproductive.
Speaking up, asserting yourself, and expressing your needs, desires, boundaries, and limits are not topping from the bottom. Advocating for yourself is not an attempt to control the dynamic—it’s a crucial and necessary part of getting your needs met as a submissive.
A Dominant’s role requires understanding the needs of both people in order to effectively lead you toward shared goals. They cannot do that if you’re silent. Doms are not mind readers.
Examples of behaviors that are not topping from the bottom include:
The distinction between what is and isn’t topping from the bottom ultimately comes down to healthy communication of needs, desires, boundaries, and limits.
When you establish a power exchange dynamic—whether for a single scene or an ongoing relationship—you should speak up about these things. Doing so ensures they can actually be honored, and it allows your Dom to consciously consent to taking responsibility for them. In exchange, you agree to yield authority to your Dom in the specifically negotiated areas.
Once those agreements are in place, you allow your Dom to lead. You then provide feedback through agreed-upon communication channels about how you’re experiencing their leadership—when something isn’t working and when you need to advocate for yourself again.
The issue arises in how needs are communicated after the Dom/sub agreement has been made. The key difference lies in requesting—which preserves your Dom’s agency and authority within the dynamic—rather than demanding, manipulating, or failing to communicate clearly.
“Sir, would you please…” is not topping from the bottom.
“If you don’t let me come, I’m going to safeword and go do it myself!” is topping from the bottom. That’s not a request—it’s a demand backed by a threat.
Some additional examples of statements that are not topping from the bottom:
These are expressions of limits, needs, and concerns.
If you are saying things like this and your Dom is shutting you down, it may be time to take a hard look at the relationship—because none of this is wrong. Submissives are not “less submissive” simply because they have needs and limits.
Bratting is sometimes mislabeled as topping from the bottom, but the two are not the same.
Bratting is a consensual dynamic—often between a brat and a brat tamer—where both people knowingly agree that the submissive will misbehave, break rules, challenge authority, or be defiant in playful ways. It’s part of the erotic tension and part of the fun for both parties.
In simple terms:
Submissives don’t brat because they don’t know how to behave. They brat because they crave attention and the experience of your love and care expressed through the form of behavior correction. In other words, the misbehavior serves a consensual emotional or erotic need within the structure of the dynamic—and both people are aware of that.
If you want a deeper exploration of this dynamic, read my guide on brat taming.
This is the most important section of this entire article. If you understand the underlying causes of the behavior, you can address those causes instead of assuming you’re dealing with a “bad” submissive.
First: why does anyone do anything?
To get their needs met.
It sounds simple, but this mindset is crucial. If you hold onto this lens, you’ll focus on identifying which needs are trying to be fulfilled instead of reacting to the surface behavior. As the Dom, you take responsibility for leading the dynamic—and that includes creating conditions where needs can be safely expressed and met. If the submissive believes you cannot fulfill their needs, they will not trust you.
In my experience, topping from the bottom usually happens for one of two reasons:
Because we’re wired to protect our ego first, most Dominants immediately assume it’s the first: disrespect.
From the Dominant’s perspective, being topped from the bottom feels frustrating and demoralizing. Planning and executing BDSM scenes—or managing an ongoing dynamic—is mentally and physically taxing. When a submissive interrupts, critiques, or attempts to redirect things, it can feel like they don’t appreciate the effort involved. It can land as a criticism of competence or even an attack on character. It may seem like you’ve upheld your role as the Dominant, but they’ve failed to uphold theirs.
Personally, it took time and reflection for me to recognize that when a submissive pushed back, it usually wasn’t about respect. The vast majority of the time, it was about trust.
This can feel confusing. After all, your submissive agreed to the dynamic. Intellectually, they trust you on some level.
But trust is complex.
We can verbally say we trust someone, yet it’s our nervous system that truly determines whether surrender feels safe. If they do not trust you at an embodied, nervous system level, they will resist surrendering to you. In many cases, they’ll resist surrendering to themselves.
That’s the part that confuses submissives. They say they want this dynamic—but their body won’t let them fully lean in.
Topping from the bottom is often a defense mechanism. It’s a way to regain control in situations where the nervous system perceives risk. It’s an attempt to stay safe. It’s an attempt to ensure needs are met—especially the fundamental need for safety.
So why might trust be lacking?
So now you have a situation where the submissive has a need—and they don’t fully trust that you can meet it. Sometimes that lack of trust is about you. Sometimes it’s about them. Often, it’s about both of you.
What happens next?
They use whatever communication tools they learned were safe or acceptable in the past.
If they were taught healthy communication, they will assert themselves, clearly express their needs, and make requests.
If they were taught unhealthy communication, they will resort to passive-aggressive behavior, manipulation, or indirect control.
The hard truth is that most of us were never taught that it was safe to ask directly for our needs. As children, when we spoke up, we were often told to be quiet, dismissed, or ignored. In more extreme cases, we were shamed or rejected simply for having needs at all.
So we adapt.
We learn to ask covertly. We learn to manipulate subtly. We learn to control indirectly—because direct expression didn’t feel safe.
The submissive is not actively trying to disrespect you.
They are trying to protect themselves. They are trying to get their needs met. They are trying to communicate—but may not yet know how to do so effectively.
So your focus should be on:
Not on the surface-level disobedience.
Now that we understand why this dynamic tends to occur, it’s time to examine your specific situation. Approach it with curiosity rather than defensiveness. The goal isn’t to win—it’s to understand.
We’re going to look at this from both sides of the slash because, ultimately, you are on the same team. Yes, we play with power in these dynamics—but they are not meant to become power struggles (unless, of course, you are consciously and consensually incorporating that into your play).
As I alluded to earlier, it’s easy to jump to conclusions when a submissive appears to be topping from the bottom. Most Dominants default to interpreting it as disrespect.
Before reacting, pause.
Your first step is to ask questions. There’s a short set of questions I like to ask both myself and my submissive whenever we find ourselves in a situation where topping from the bottom may be happening.
Ask yourself and ask them:
These questions help move the conversation beneath the surface behavior and toward the root issue.
Let’s break down what you can do with each one.
The likelihood that the issue is pure disrespect is usually smaller than we initially assume. Simply asking whether they respect you can provide reassurance, soothe your own anxiety, and allow you to refocus on deeper causes.
That said, sometimes it is about respect.
If that’s the case, you have meaningful work ahead of you. Respect is foundational to a submissive’s surrender. Ask yourself honestly: do you surrender to the direction of someone you don’t respect?
If respect is lacking, it often relates to how you are leading yourself and your own life. This may mean returning to the foundations of your dominance and focusing on your own development. The old adage applies here: master yourself before you attempt to master another.
If you need structure for that work, I recommend revisiting your foundational development as a Dom and strengthening the core traits that naturally inspire respect.
More often than not, this is where the issue lies.
In some way, shape, or form, your submissive does not fully trust you.
It’s important to recognize that when a submissive expresses this, it does not mean they don’t trust you across every domain of the relationship. If that were the case, they likely wouldn’t respect you either—and you’d need to revisit the previous section. Instead, the lack of trust is usually specific and contained to particular areas.
In all of my guides on setting up a power exchange relationship, I make it clear: a submissive does not surrender their entire life from day one. Surrender happens in specific domains—ideally one at a time—where they either already trust you or are willing to take a calculated risk to see if you are trustworthy.
For example:
Trust is multidimensional.
Trust researcher Rachel Botsman describes four key ingredients we use to determine whether someone is trustworthy. These apply directly to D/s dynamics.
The four ingredients of trustworthiness are:
These ingredients matter for both Doms and submissives. However, how they are demonstrated across the slash differs slightly.
When you build competency as a Dom—whether in technical skills like choking or in high-level decision-making that affects someone’s life—your submissive can trust that you are capable of leading them safely in that domain.
Their nervous system relaxes. They no longer need to stay hyper-alert for harm caused by incompetence. When trust falters here, it’s often a skill gap—not a character flaw.
When you build reliability—delivering consistent outcomes, upholding structure, and following through on what you say—you become a constant in an unpredictable world.
Predictability calms the nervous system. Your presence shifts from being a source of anxiety to a place of steadiness.
When you build empathy, your submissive trusts that you consider the emotional and psychological consequences of your decisions. They trust that if harm occurs, you will acknowledge it, seek repair, and take responsibility.
Submissives don’t expect perfection. They expect ownership.
That’s what allows them to take risks in surrender—even when their nervous system is still learning that it’s safe.
When you build integrity—aligning your words and actions, speaking truthfully, and living according to your principles—your submissive can believe you.
They can believe you when you say you will take care of them. They can believe you when you say you will avoid causing harm. They can believe you when you say you will stop if they say no.
Integrity is what makes your authority credible.
If you want a deeper dive into developing these four traits within your dynamic, read Building Trust in a Dom/Sub Relationship.
The issue may not be that they don’t trust you—it may be that they don’t yet trust themselves.
Surrender requires loosening the tight grip of self-control we maintain over ourselves every day. It means exposing ourselves not only to the uncertainty of the outside world, but also to the parts of ourselves we repress because they feel overwhelming, chaotic, or threatening to the fragile identities we’ve constructed.
Sometimes, the submissive simply does not trust those parts of themselves.
As a Dom, you are guiding your submissive into those spaces. When resistance shows up—when they lash out, micromanage, or try to regain control—it may be a projection of their internal fear. Because you are leading them toward that edge, you receive the resistance, even though it is themselves they are truly resisting.
That resistance can stem from trauma, attachment patterns, unexplored aspects of identity, or natural fears of stepping into a submissive mindset. Your role in these moments is not to force them, judge them, or reprimand them. It is to listen. To hold space. To have uncomfortable conversations. To gently move beneath the surface behavior and uncover the deeper emotions and unspoken needs driving it.
Leadership here requires patience, not pressure.
This should not be your first conclusion—but it is worth exploring if other avenues have not led to resolution.
Some people enjoy being bottoms—having actions done to them—while still maintaining full psychological control. Others may have dominant inclinations and only wish to be submissive in very specific contexts or domains.
It’s also important to acknowledge that, for many women in particular, societal messaging can create the assumption that they are “supposed” to be submissive. Cultural conditioning runs deep.
But authentic submission does not feel like constant tension. Over time, it feels like relief—not white-knuckled endurance.
If she is not finding moments of genuine surrender—if there is no sense of release, grounding, or peace in the dynamic—it’s worth asking whether this is truly the role she desires. It may be that she would rather be in charge.
Honest discussion is essential to uncover these truths.
If you both ultimately desire to occupy the dominant position within a relationship, you may be facing a fundamental incompatibility. Not all dynamics can be negotiated into alignment—and recognizing that is a form of maturity, not failure.
Surrender.
What does your body feel when you read that word?
This will likely be the hardest act of your submission: relinquishing control and trusting your Dom completely, even though it’s what you want most.
First, you have to surrender to yourself—to the desires that have been clawing their way out of you while you’ve been holding them back.
Then you take a leap of faith. Even with careful negotiation, vetting, and trust-building, there is still a leap involved. You can never fully know another person. At some point, you must decide to trust that your Dom truly has your best interests at heart.
The Dom you chose—the one you respect—is here to lead you through your submissive journey. But they can’t do that if you’re constantly resisting them.
And you will resist.
You will have to surrender internally, again and again.
Because the Dominant has taken responsibility for the dynamic—holding the well-being of both people in mind—you show trust by showing respect: acknowledging their role and authority, treating them with honor and courtesy, and valuing their guidance and decisions. You don’t respect a Dominant simply because they hold power; you respect them because they hold responsibility.
Here’s the core of it—the thing that separates submission from being a doormat, a people-pleaser, or a victim of someone else’s will:
You are choosing to submit.
Power-exchange relationships are consensual exchanges. Consent is the key word. You choose to give your power to them. That choice is yours. You both enter into an agreement for mutual pleasure: you agree to surrender control, and they agree to accept it. Never forget that this is a choice—one both of you are responsible for honoring.
Remembering that you can always say yes or no is what makes true surrender possible. It allows your Dominant to lead you—or ravish you—without crossing into something that feels unsafe or wrong.
Let’s look at some strategies to help you with this process.
One of the biggest challenges for new submissives is getting into the right mindset to actually be submissive.
Especially if you’re a hard-charging, go-getter who is always in control and carrying a lot of responsibility in your daily life, you may find yourself stuck in a frustrating paradox: you crave surrender, yet you can’t fully let go.
The submissive mindset offers the opposite of your everyday reality. It’s a place where the to-do list dies, someone else calls the shots, and your only job is to feel. Psychologists call this compensatory dynamics—we seek balance by indulging in what we’re most deprived of. Yet every time you try to fully submit, your brain kicks into overdrive and you start to resist.
Many people believe that submission means doing whatever the Dom says, no matter what—or that if they let go of control, something very bad is going to happen. But submission isn’t a passive role where you simply allow anything to be done to you. It’s about consciously choosing the areas where you’re willing to give up control, and then surrendering those areas to someone you trust to lead you well.
To do that, you need to:
Taking these steps grants you the mental freedom to indulge in what you want most: relief from worry, anxiety, uncertainty, and the relentless stress of daily life—while being ravished like you’re the most desirable object in the world. This guide will walk you through those exact steps.
Everyone has a different threshold for how much trust-building behavior they need to see before they feel comfortable trusting someone. If a person has experienced trauma from having their trust violated in the past, they are often what they describe as a “slow burn”—someone who requires repeated demonstrations of trustworthiness before they can fully let go.
I see this most often from the submissive side.
What I tell many submissives who struggle to surrender is this: at some point, you will have to take a leap of faith that your Dom can guide you where you want to go. Even with the best negotiation, vetting, and intentional trust-building, surrender ultimately requires risk. You can never fully know another person.
It’s easy to believe that you can’t take a risk on someone without trust. However, it’s the very act of risk-taking—of being vulnerable to harm—that allows trust to develop.
When we take a risk in trusting someone and they do not abuse or exploit that opportunity, trust compounds. We become more willing to take larger and more meaningful risks with them in the future.
The key is the size of the risk.
If you struggle with trusting partners, start small. Take a micro-risk, observe how they respond, and then gradually increase the stakes. You’re essentially engaging in exposure therapy—expanding your capacity for trust by introducing manageable risks and adjusting based on how your partner handles them.
When building trust in any area of a D/s dynamic, your willingness to take larger risks depends on your ability to manage your own safety.
For example:
The more regulated and resourced you are, the larger the risks you can tolerate.
Of course, if you want your Dom to take control, you will have to relinquish some control. That does not mean handing over your entire life immediately. You have no way of knowing whether they can handle that responsibility. Start small. With each successful experience of giving up control, you can offer more the next time.
An excellent starting point is to say, in a playful and non-confrontational tone:
“I’d like you to choose for me.”
You are not testing them. You are inviting them to step into this role.
For example:
If they are not accustomed to making decisions for you, they may respond with, “I don’t know what you want.” Don’t become frustrated. Reassure them that you genuinely want them to decide, and share how it makes you feel when they take control.
If they choose something you don’t like, resist the urge to berate them. The goal is not perfection—it’s growth. You are creating opportunities for their dominant traits to develop and for your trust in their judgment to strengthen. Over time, they will become more attuned to your preferences as their confidence grows and they receive constructive feedback.
The same principle applies to play and sex. If you want them to tie you up, begin with simple restraints or tools that require less technical skill—such as bondage tape instead of rope. As they practice, don’t criticize or nitpick. Instead, reinforce what they are doing well and express what you’re enjoying.
Encouragement builds confidence. Confidence builds competence. Competence builds trust.
And trust is what makes surrender possible.
How do you make your needs known to your Dom?
Do you demand what you want—or do you ask for it?
As a submissive, you are consensually giving up control to your Dom. When you do, they assume responsibility for fulfilling your negotiated needs. But they can only fulfill what has been clearly communicated.
It sounds simple. Sometimes it is. Often, it’s not—especially when frustration has built up over something you feel has been lacking. In those moments, it’s easy to snap into criticism or demand. It’s almost always more effective to ask first.
There is also a deeper reason to request change rather than demand it: consent.
We often focus—rightfully—on the ways a Dom might violate a submissive’s consent, given the inherent power imbalance and vulnerability within the dynamic.
However, failing to allow the Dom the freedom to decide whether to fulfill a request—without guilt, coercion, or passive-aggressive pressure—can violate the Dom’s consent as well.
A Dom is a willing participant in fulfilling your needs. That means they are not obligated to comply with every request (or subtle demand). Authority does not eliminate autonomy.
That said, your voice absolutely matters.
You are the only one who can advocate for your needs. A Dom sets the direction of the dynamic, so their own needs are often structurally integrated. If you remain silent, yours may go unmet. While a good Dom should check in regularly, it is ultimately your responsibility to ensure your needs are expressed and heard.
This is why consistent feedback is essential.
Let your Dominant know when something isn’t working—but also express gratitude and appreciation when it is. Positive reinforcement strengthens leadership just as much as constructive critique.
There is, however, an art to giving feedback in a way that is heard, respected, and taken seriously rather than dismissed.
Tips for Giving Feedback to a Dom
Sometimes the roles and rules themselves can block something important that needs to be said. For those moments, I recommend creating a communication safeword. Much like a safeword in a scene, this word temporarily suspends protocol and power exchange, allowing you both to speak as equals.
There is a significant amount of introspective work involved in BDSM. A great deal of time is spent soul-searching and self-evaluating on both sides of the slash. Submission is not a switch you flip—it’s a process. It takes time.
Communication is essential—not just from the Dominant, but from the submissive as well. A dynamic cannot thrive if only one voice is engaged in reflection and growth.
An unwillingness or difficulty in surrendering does not invalidate someone’s role. It doesn’t mean they are “bad” at submission or incapable of the dynamic. It may simply indicate that there is deeper internal work to be done before proceeding in a healthy and sustainable way.
Surrender is gained through trust, safety, and consistency.
And like anything meaningful, it develops over time.

A practical communication masterclass that teaches you how to identify your desires, ask for them clearly, and assert them with confidence—in and out of the bedroom.
Learn More



Level up your sex life with D/s coaching.